this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1712 points (94.6% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
2724 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like whoever first started bringing the term "assault weapon" to gun debates really killed the argument.

Admittedly, the only useful argument I've ever heard on the idea of grouping them has been the thought that they are purchased for their popularity and "coolness", eg based on their appearance in some movie or video game, not specifically for their practical use of any civil kind. And, people who buy guns with no practical purpose in mind for them (as opposed to say, a person holding a restraining order expecting to defend themself) are more likely to end up letting them into an unsafe situation (by theft, jadedness, or pure accidents)

Still - not a strong argument, and I'd prefer it if we focused on how guns are used, not how black and tacticool they are.

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I feel like whoever first started bringing the term "assault weapon" to gun debates really killed the argument

That would be the pro gun control side. They wanted to conflate assault rifles as in the actual military rifles, and the downgraded civilian semi-auto rifles. The distinction is important, look up the process it takes to purchase a machine gun in the US sometimes. They deliberately want a culture of ignorance around guns, because the goal is total disarmament, not effective regulation.

You can see the result in this thread and others. People will claim that someone can just walk into a Walmart and buy a machine gun. Politicians talk about banning "fully semi auto assault weapons". The OP image and plenty of comments here mock the idea that someone should expect a base amount of knowledge in the subject before proposing new laws. Someone trying to define proposed regulation or correct a mistaken assumption about current laws is branded an "Ammosexual".

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’d kindly ask you not to put words in my mouth. I am pro gun control. I am not pro total disarmament - logically, such a thing isn’t even at all practical, especially because it isn’t achieved in any of the countries we use for comparisons about “what works”.

People are constantly misinformed about tons of issues across the world, including journalists. Take your blame to them. Don’t use it as an illogical thread to make a different point.

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What part of my reply made you think that I was talking about you in particular?