this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
108 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
2958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
108
Support for PassKey Integration (Web Authentication API) in KeePassXC implemented (github.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jeena@jemmy.jeena.net to c/technology@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Passkey support arrived in KeePassXC https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/1870

Just last week so it's not in any distributions yet, but a binary can be found here: https://snapshot.keepassxc.org/build-235575/

I haven't tried it yet because I haven't been using passkeys because it wasn't implemented in KeePassXC but now that it is I will try on some page which implements it. Just need to figure out who implements it. I think none of the Fediverse services does yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] slumberlust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would this be susceptible to a MitM attack intercepting the decrypted secret?

[โ€“] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago

No, because it's a public private key pair, you have the private key and the server has the public key. So you end up sending the secret back encrypted as well. I just used that as an explainer. It's not actually how that works.