this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
21 points (95.7% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1630 readers
18 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New Zealand judge Evangelos Thomas criticised failures of safety audits given ‘obvious risks’ that led to 2019 fatal eruption

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] liv@lemmy.nz 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I have to admit it's weird to me that tourists are ever allowed to go there.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I went there about 20 years ago, as a PFY even I was surprised at how lax the whole operation was.

Also, think volcanoes are risky? Wait until you hear about cars ;-)

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago

I've had people argue tooth and nail with me that the guests knew the risks and nobody should be liable.

Absolutely mental attitude, you can't opt out of health and safety legislation.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I would argue that it has a lower risk than riding in a jet boat (or at least, before this event it could have been argued). Every few years someone dies in a jetboat crash, but this event I believe was the first time ever that there has been volcanic eruption tourism deaths, except perhaps the pink and white terraces in the 1800s.

The court cases show heaps of issues with the procedures, but I don't see a reason not to allow anyone to ever go there. Just maybe don't go when the alert level has been raised and make sure you stay within health and safety rules.

We also let people ski on Ruapehu which erupts every so often, seems the same to me.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I can see your point.

I always got the impression seismologically Whakaari was more likely to go than Ruapehu, but that might just be because it's a tsunami risk so civil defence always talked about it. "White Island Eruption" was a bit like "Quicksand".

In terms of the jet boat I think it's a probability vs magnitude issue i.e a jetboat is not able to kill as many people at a time. Also not sure whether the per capita is much worse?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago

I think it's where the volcanic alert levels come in. At this event, the rating had been raised to say there was a risk but operators still went anyway because they got away with it in the past. I can see a future where we continue these trips but only at volcanic alert levels of 0 or 1.