this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

4507 readers
9 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to take wildlife/outdoor photos recreationally. I don't want to get frustrated by photo quality, but I also don't want to spend more than I need to. That being said I'm willing to consider expensive equipment, but only if it benefits my needs. Does anyone have some canned recommendations?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stochasticity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are definitely winning the confidence vote.

Regarding the lens, is there a reason to not do something like the below if it appears to be less expensive? At least ostensibly they cover a similar range of focal lengths, but using two lenses.

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/canon-eos-r50-4k-video-mirrorless-camera-2-lens-kit-with-rf-s-18-45mm-and-rf-s-55-210mm-lenses-black/6535112.p?skuId=6535112