this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
511 points (86.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
534 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wsweg@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Let’s say you need a plumber to come fix a leak. How does he get his tools and supplies there? On his mule and cart?

For this example I’ll use the US average commute of 27.6 miles (44.4 km) one way. Based on what I looked up, a donkey pulling a cart is ~4.5 mp/h (7.2 km/h). That’s 12 hours of travel time there and back. Help me understand how this is reasonable.

[–] thebrownhaze@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Easy. Get rid of indoor plumbing

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most traffic is neither freight nor service teams with their turnout kit.

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

No, most traffic isn’t. A large portion of the population would be just as well off if they used public transport. However, there’s also a portion that the complete banning of road vehicles would be extremely detrimental to their livelihoods.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Again, sufficiency and resilience. If you live in a rural space, you learn to fix shit yourself. Famously: tractors.

If you believe that rural just means "own a house in a village or next to a town", that's not it, that's tourism. That's like owning a cabin in the woods or like the car-dependent suburbia. What makes you a rural dweller is participation in the rural economy or subsistence living. If you live like a guest, you are a guest.

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Based on your replies to my comments, I agree with you a lot. I haven’t been saying that we shouldn’t transition away from car-focused infrastructure and living. Rather, OP’s pipe-dream of banning cars and solving the infrastructure/living issue in 5 years is ridiculous.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He loads up his hand cart with his tools, he walks 500m to the train station, he travels 43.4 km on the train, and then he walks 500m to my house.

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where’s all this rail infrastructure coming from? If cars are banned it will take exponentially longer to complete. What does the population do in the meantime?

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I think 5 years is a reasonable span of time to transition out of cars if it's our top priority and we put all our resources into a green new deal.

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just curious, are you a white-collar worker?

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That is a very vague term and I don't think my job fits neatly into blue collar or white collar. If you're asking whether I do hands on work at jobsites, the answer is yes.