this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
511 points (86.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9612 readers
145 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People in this thread thinking this is a serious policy proposal 🤣

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The automobiles, parking and highways vicious cycle has proven to be an indictment of capitalism and the corruption of the US. i don't think going electric for all our cas is going to be enough, and were seeing climate migration not only to the US but northward within the US.

The movie Mad Max (and its sequels) was inspired by somone observing car obsession tendencies among Australians and positing how fuel would be prioritized above its utility. Our obsession is worse here in the States, and for our love of cars and failure to change for sake of the world may see a similar apocalypse, though with fewer working vehicles and a lot more cannibalism.

I hope I'm wrong, of couse.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

I completely agree but that doesn’t make immediately banning all cars a reasonable proposal. My assumption was that the meme was intended to spark discussion, which it certainly has. Though it sounds like OP is a little more serious than I thought.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I seriously think petrol cars should be 100% banned by 2028, and that it should be illegal for petrol stations to operate.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Okay well you are entitled to your opinion I guess. I thought you were being somewhat tongue in cheek. While I support a radical reduction in car dependency the unfortunate reality is that deconstructing car based infrastructure and building what will come after is going to take more than 5 years.

Also, even in a society where the car is not the default mode of transit, there will still be occasional situations where alternates aren’t viable. A small number of electric vehicles, properly contained where they can’t murder thousands of people as they do today would not be so terrible.

[–] dub@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How would people who live in suburbs or rural areas do anything? Many Americans live in these areas. I'm serious what is the plan for all of them?

America wasn't built for public travel unfortunately.

[–] Bucket_of_Truth@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

How do we deal with the areas with no people living in them?

I'm mostly joking, but an extreme proposal like this would probably only take effect in metropolitan areas. 80%+ of Americans live in an urban setting. Electric trains and busses in the city, electric trucks in the country.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

America used to have these things called streetcar suburbs, and they're awesome. The entire suburb is built around a tram station, it's walking distance from everyone and it goes on to the nearby suburbs and eventually the city. Modern zoning laws make streetcar suburbs illegal to build, but a few of them still exist, and people love living in them. The rent prices in streetcar suburbs have been raised greatly due to the high demand. If we started building streetcar suburbs instead of car suburbs, everyone would be able to afford to live in one. They're also cheaper to build in terms of land, plumbing, and utilities. The road upkeep is cheaper and the people in them are happier.

[–] dub@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So essentially buses. That works if you live within a few miles of your destination city. But things are so spread out nowadays that there's just no way that you could have a single system of buses or streetcar. Whatever to make use of everybody's time.

I grew up in suburban America where even on bike it would take me 20 minutes to get to the nearest urban development or business. Let alone trying to get to the nearest city. And now with everybody so spread apart of where they work and how they get there. There's just no feasible way to make the system for everybody.

People used to live within a few miles of where they worked, but nowadays everything has been built for cars and to undo that would be an almost impossible effort

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We need to bulldoze places like where you grew up and build sustainable developments.

[–] Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A very reasonable and realistic option.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The opposite happened already. Communities were bulldozed to build highways.

[–] dub@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Oh ok you could have just said there's no way to do it from the beginning

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

It can be rebuilt. 5 years is way optimistic but it can be done. It must be done.