this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
198 points (99.5% liked)
Europe
8484 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Many contracts have long terms and took time and effort to negotiate. A law like that would have large revenue implications. It would upend the entire business. I wouldn’t be surprised if the entertainment companies take this to court or pull out of those markets entirely. The EU should not dictate product offerings. If people don’t like a service’s offerings, they can use another one. It is an abuse of their power.
If anything it is an abuse of the powers granted by copyright law to those companies to only offer content in very limited ways.
Sorry, I understand and partially agree that this can put streaming services in a tricky situation but I strongly disagree with this.
It is exactly the duty of legislature like the EU to define the rules in a market and counteract market imbalances.
Imagine if you only watch a show on Netflix is you are physically in Texas and as soon as you are in Oklahoma you can't anymore. And then believe Netflix would pull out of the US market just because the federal government passed a bill mandating that content needs to be available in the entire US and not just select states.