this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
431 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would you support enforced veganism, and jailing anybody who eats or prepares meat?

[–] quarry_coerce248@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you destroy the world for taste? I don't get where your question is coming from

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just want to be clear what your position is. You're not just encouraging veganism, you're calling on the violence of the police to beat and imprison people who eat meat.

I'm not necessarily arguing against it, I just want the clarity that you finally provided.

It's easy to suggest outlawing stuff without considering the violence necessary for outlawing things. You have clearly considered (and enthusiastically endorse) that violence.

Of course if you imprison all meat eaters but still use oil to harvest, process, and distribute all the plant based foods then the world will still burn, but that's beyond the scope of this particular issue.

[–] quarry_coerce248@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congratulations, you perfected strawmanning. I have no idea who you are replying to. There is nothing in there that I wrote.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does everything have to go to the extreme end of straight to jail?

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The post to which I replied said:

So at some point you as an individual have to adapt to a vegan diet, either by choice or because there is no alternative.

Do you want to stop eating meat the moment it is outlawed?

We need both regulation to end animal farming and convince individual consumers, that they have to become vegans

If they want "regulations" to "end" animal farming then I just want to be clear that they support imprisoning people who prepare or eat meat. They went to the extreme of jail without mentioning the word jail.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Mate, it's illegal for teenagers to buy R rated movies and I've never heard of anyone going to jail for it. Why can't meat be like that?

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I don't support jail for anyone, because it's a bad way to solve crime. I think anyone who eats meat should be sentenced to something productive like community service, or therapy to get to the bottom of why they think they have the right to kill others.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would refuse that community service and therapy. What would happen then?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

At that point you aren't being punished for the (hypothetical, in this scenario) "crime" of eating meat, but instead the crime of not obeying your sentencing.

In the same way if I refuse to pay a parking ticket they can (eventually) lock me up for noncompliance. You wouldn't make the argument that I'm being locked up for a parking ticket in the same way no one would argue you bring locked up for avoiding your community service sentence is akin to being locked up for eating meat.

Granted, a less extreme approach would just be to tax the everliving shit out of meat production and use the proceeds to mitigate the environmental impacts as well as provide assistance for the lower income families who may be otherwise disproportionately impacted. Sin taxes can be very effective if done properly.

Either way, you're just being hyperbolic.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Well then under communism, you wouldn't be invited to any of the cool parties, and you'd be refused service at most non-essential places like restaurants and gyms. People would think you're a weirdo.