this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
458 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3018 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm all for it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iegod@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Photoshop alone is worth keeping a windows or OSX device around.

[–] gornius@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You just need to realize that Adobe doesn't release their stuff on Linux, not because it doesn't allow them to, but Linux desktop market share is too small.

It's a chicken and egg problem. Once Adobe would release their stuff, magically there would be a massive movement to improve HDR support, color accuracy etc.

And you need to realize Microsoft achieved such a giant market share thanks to illegal monopolistic practices in 90s, that still have huge impacts today.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That doesn't change the reality that I will go where Photoshop is available.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That’s an Adobe problem

If the audience moves to Linux then it will follow

[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That, and Gimp is quite a capable photo editing tool.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

And there's Krita.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gimp is not that good, and not even close to being a Photoshop replacement.

[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not a perfect replacement, and I never claimed as such. But for most people's needs, gimp is perfectly capable.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago
[–] iegod@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't care who or where the problem or source is. I will buy the platform where Photoshop is used, and as a result it will likely inform every other decision about my daily driver. It's really that simple.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why would Adobe ever move?

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do they need to? To capture 3% of a market that hates proprietary anyway? Come on.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

My point was that people saying “I’ll move when X moves” should just suck it up because X will move after they do

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just an FYI, Photoshop runs reasonably well under Wine now, if you follow this guide: https://github.com/LinSoftWin/Photoshop-CC2022-Linux