this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1061 points (90.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

30029 readers
612 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wikipedia was useful for me as a grad student because I could look up a topic and there would be a whole lot of citations I could follow. I never used them as a source, but rather as a curated forum of information.

[–] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia is like our dear friend. It gives us general information, good advice, and direction in life, but never gets too deeply in it. The choice is ours to make.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only problem is that half of them are broken :(

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd be impressed by how good I was at finding PDFs of original articles on random sites. Turns out that when you go to grad school in the third world and don't have access to the journals in the same way as you are accustomed, you learn how to do it for yourself.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This was back in 2010-ish. Don't know if it works the same way now, there are probably better ways to go about it. Not sure if sci-hub existed at that time. Will remember that going forward.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been doing exactly the same thing with LLMs recently.

"Tell me about "
"What are the big problems their industry is trying to solve?"
"Who are their biggest competitors?"
"What's the worst/best thing about them?"

Questions like that often give me a great framework to look up specific questions, find relevant articles and get a handle on the sources that are likely to be useful.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd definitely be careful about made up stuff, but this sounds like an interesting idea.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Very careful. I never use anything from them directly. I just use them to give me a starting point on what to look for.

For example, if the AI tells me that some company is know for their low latency database, I'll look around for primary sources on the latency of the database compared to other vendors. I'll also look for evidence to the contrary.