this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
90 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59600 readers
3375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This got deleted from lemmy.ml for fuck all reason so reposting here, I assume the mods here will be more reasonable as this is a completely normal article and good information for any users here that also use Weibo, maybe it's a sensitive issue but to my knowledge none of the information presented here is false so the takedown was for petty reasons

The massive Chinese social media network Sina Weibo informed its platform’s most popular users last week that they must display their real identities, including names, gender, IP locations, as well as professional and educational background, on their account page starting at the end of October.

The policy will first apply to Weibo users with more than 1 million followers and later extend to those with half a million followers. It is believed that other social media platforms in China will also follow the move.

China implemented the online real-name registration system in 2012. Under the policy, personal data are stored on the platforms and are invisible to other users. Last year, Chinese social media platforms started displaying the IP locations of social media users to crack down on online rumors, including witness accounts of social incidents such as protests.

The latest change was confirmed by Weibo’s CEO Wang Gaofei, who briefly activated the personal information display on his profile page on October 20, 2023. Wang’s social credit status, employment, and professional and educational background were all listed on this profile page.

The new policy triggered a heated debate on Chinese social media. Unexpectedly, online patriots, who are usually fairly united, split into two camps over the new requirements.

read more: https://globalvoices.org/2023/10/23/new-policy-requires-chinese-influencers-to-display-their-real-identities-on-weibo/

global times article for comparison: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202310/1299946.shtml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gsa@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This got deleted from lemmy.ml for fuck all reason so reposting here

lemmy.ml mods are China simps and tankies, you shouldn't be surprised it was deleted

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wondered why they were so opposed to a factual article which contains thoughtful commentary from several different perspectives (as opposed to a clear, obvious slant)… but then I realized I was simply repeating a classic mistake that I’ve made before. I was expecting reasonable behavior from unreasonable people.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yes. If skin could be thinner it would be zero atoms thick. They love to level accusations and build straw men. So when it comes to actually defending their ideology. It's delete, block, banhammer and sickle.

[–] tree@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wanted people from instances banned from popular instances like world ie grad, hexbear to be able to give their take on it, but I guess the mods couldn't handle trying to reach the widest audience, won't be posting similar things there again, especially given the moderation, removed from two comms with the information "rule 1" when one of the comms doesn't even have a "rule 1", doesn't even have the common curtiousy to give their actual reason for taking them down or dm me about it, really immature and petty from my pov

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would you even want their take?

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

And we already know what their takes would be: hot.

[–] tree@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't like all the defederation drama even though in many cases they started it, I prefer the reddit approach where I can interact with pretty much everyone, my instance is only defedded with the borderline illegal gross burggit stuff and the openly racist one and I think that's preferrable to leave the user to block individuals or communities they don't like other than the heinous stuff, I would rather have my posts reach most people on the site rather than smaller subsections personally.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regardless, you do know they're just wrong and brainwashed, right?

[–] tree@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe to an extent but I would say a lot of other people are "brainwashed" in a different way, you drop a Canadian super pro China guy into Beijing and they would not stand out as much as if you dropped some super pro US guy there, your conceptiοn of "brainwashing" lies entirely based on being in a vast majority English language site with vast majority North American and European users, there's a lot more people in the world than only westerners and or english speakers and a lot of them have opinions you wouldn't agree with and they aren't any more or less brainwashed than you, you would only see them as more brainwashed because they take heterodox opions in your corner of the internet

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nah, once you're pro-genocide you're just objectively wrong. It has nothing to do with cultural differences and is not subjective. Same with many other things, like Taiwan. Taiwan is factually an independent country. Many Chinese don't think so because they're brainwashed. But a fact is a fact.