this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
91 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2776 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Drones are complicated.

At the consumer grade/size, they are mostly good for reconnaissance and "guerilla tactics"

The former is what they have been used for by militaries for probably over a decade at this point. Take a quad rotor out of someone's pack, send it up, see what is over the hill or around the corner. Significantly less risk than poking your head around the corner but not stealthy at all. As such, attrition is closer to soldiers breaking stuff in the field than a disposable item.

The latter is what all the popular videos out of Ukraine (... and Australian youtube) are about. Duct tape some C4 to a drone or rig up a release for a hand grenade. This has worked rather well against russia... mostly because they are so incredibly un-disciplined and un-trained.

Against anything even close to a "near peer": supply convoys will be nowhere near as over extended because that is just idiotic tactically. At which point you have a few soft targets but mostly are going up against armor and APCs (there is a reason the US is buying a new one and it isn't just because the military industrial complex sends really nice xmas cards). At which point you just have sentries listening for rotors or even mics hooked up to computers to listen for the frequencies. Hear a motor? Button up

Same with during combat where sending armor into a city is either post-battle oppression or suicide.

Which leaves outposts and bases. Where even just having some suspended netting goes a long way toward negating the precision and damage of those drones. And, combined with the aforementioned detection systems, greatly negates their impact.

As for why consumer grade drones as offensive weapons is mostly a "guerilla tactic" as it were? Because artillery has just as much accuracy and considerably more range. But nations around the world have been intentionally limiting the munitions going into Ukraine to prolong this war and prevent "taking a side". Because, if the enemy is close enough that you can drop a grenade on them? They are close enough that you can fire a few mortars or call in an artillery strike.

And... I honestly expect to see further restrictions on drones following this. Most "western" countries already have rules about what size they can be. So there might not be enough profit to really justify mass production by new firms.