this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
-27 points (17.1% liked)
Science
13013 readers
17 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe the creator Pete Judo should lean on his behavioral science and psychology background to find out why it doesn't.
For me, the reason I'm not going to watch it is because the title and thumb scream "social media conspiracy theorist" rather than the seriousness and professionalism the topic rightly deserves.
Glowing red eyes? How am I supposed to believe this is a serious and/or constructive criticism of a huge genuine problem?
I guess you would hate every single leftist channel in France with that. Maybe I misunderstood the overall position of this community. I can see trying to address scientific fraud is frown upon here.
I hate any cheap tricks used to provoke emotional responses as a method of generating engagement. I especially hate when the person using them boasts a background that implies their use is very intentional.
I wouldn't know, I'm nobody's ambassador.
But you have certainly misunderstood mine. Addressing scientific fraud is entirely worthwhile and necessary.
I just won't be choosing a source for that who I suspect is deliberately manipulative and pushing dodgy investment schemes. His entire brand looks like a desperate attempt to be seen as an authority on anything at all.