this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
57 points (98.3% liked)
British Columbia
1338 readers
43 users here now
News, highlights and more relating to this great province!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m divided on this one. On the one hand, there’s a crisis facing indigenous peoples. On the other hand, this is a pretty normal Halloween sign that has nothing to do with that. It might be in poor taste but I’m not fully convinced.
There's no fault here, imo...the person that put up the sign probably wasn't thinking about events in Winnipeg. But that doesn't change the fact that someone was killed and thrown away like trash. This sign pokes fun (albeit unintentionally) at a very real and raw situation. It's fair to ask them to remove the sign, so as not to put the families of these missing women through more pain.
Honestly, everything could trigger some group based on that logic. What about a zombie pictured with missing limbs at the local recreation center triggering amputees. What about a nerf whistling football at a school setting off refugees who'd escaped bombing in their home country.
Why does this scenario warrant action, when other similar situations do not?
There's a line that needs to be drawn somewhere, and I honestly don't think this sign is on the wrong side of it.
Not every group of people has recently, within the last year, had to contend with two of their members being murdered and thrown in a landfill, and then it becoming a major national political campaign issue.
Uh oh, looks like you triggered some people.
If this was posted on a landfill in or near Winnipeg, I'd agree that it needs to come down and would be legitimately triggering.
In a completely different province... I don't see the issue.
I'm with you on this. Almost all jokes re: Halloween are in poor taste so I'm not sure why this one is off limits suddenly after years of indifference.
That’s probably what’s happened: the government is finally taking it seriously.
As far as I can see from the article, the government didn't have anything to do with it.
They were ordered by presumably the government to remove it.
The article says the order came from the corporation that owns the facility and says nothing about the government. Do you have evidence that the government was behind it?
It says:
I interpreted that to be a government district, but I can see how it could be a fully private enterprise.
It's also a landfill on Vancouver island, and I'm from BC as well where I have hardly ever heard of these Manitoba landfill bodies. It easily could have been done in complete ignorance.