Formula 1

9059 readers

32 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location	Date
🇺🇸 United States	21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Photographer@lemmy.world

wes@lemmy.world

bwoah@lemmy.world

Haas's insistent argument for keeping Andretti out of F1 (www.the-race.com)

submitted 1 year ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/formula1@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WatTyler@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

James Vowles came closest to convincing me that a new team could really harm the back-half of the grid. I'm still in favour of the Andretti bid but I think teams like Williams should still be permitted more spending on infrastructure to bridge the gap between them and the bigger teams.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

But even then! The 200 million fee that the new team has to give is literally to reduce the impact of the prize pot dilution. It was cleverly left out of James Vowles statement.