this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
1472 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
2048 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The double slit expiriment demonstrates the duality of the nature of a photon: that it's both a wave and a particle.

When a photon is "observed" (or detected) it has the properties of a particle. However when it's travelling it acts like a wave and can demonstrate interference patterns with other photons.

So when you pass photos through two tiny slits, instead of them just passing right through like a particle, they interfere with each other and when the wave pattern collapses when it is observed on the wall, you see the interference.

That being said, I don't think this cartoon makes sense. I get what they are driving at, as they are saying it acts differently when not observed, but this is not what happens. Also this isn't a ln experiment that deals with observation forcing an outcome, but as I noted it's about the duality. Additionally, the wave pattern on the top is what you would you observe when looking at, so I'm not sure why that is what it would be like if you were looking away.

But maybe I'm missing something.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The double slit experiment is about observation.

When you fire photons through the double slits, one photon at a time, they cause wave interference patterns with themselves as if each photon travelled through both slits.

Yet if you set something up to measure which slit each photon passed through, they no longer interfere with themselves, and give you the two straight lines pattern, rather than the interference pattern.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

When you fire photons through the double slits, one photon at a time, they cause wave interference patterns with themselves as if each photon travelled through both slits.

You're right, I forgot about this part of it.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The interference pattern only appears after firing many many photons. They're still a photon (packet of energy) when creating an interference pattern. It's the distribution and probability of its location that changes. Not the physical "shape".

Edit: to clarify further

When not being detected, it's still just one dot that appears on the sheet. As more and more are fired, the interference pattern shows to show as each photon hits the screen

It's all about the distribution possibilities.

[–] Getallen@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The meme confuses two things in quantum mechanics. One is the double slit experiment, which confirms that light behaves both as a wave and a particle. That's what the meme is showing here.

However it's also throwing in Schrodinger's, which states that until you look at something it exists in all states - the classic theoretical example being the cat in a box, which is both alive and dead until you open the box. That doesn't make much sense in the real world, but when looking at quantum particles it is provably true.

Here is another meme that more accurately explains things: https://mander.xyz/post/5143468

Just to complete the set of "principles of quantum mechanics that people know of but don't fully understand", there's the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which states that you can either know the position of something or its momentum (ie where it's going). The more accurately you measure one of these, the less accurate any measurement is of the other.

Edit: However there's also what /u/Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone said below:

The double slit experiment is about observation.

When you fire photons through the double slits, one photon at a time, they cause wave interference patterns with themselves as if each photon travelled through both slits.

Yet if you set something up to measure which slit each photon passed through, they no longer interfere with themselves, and give you the two straight lines pattern, rather than the interference pattern.

So maybe the meme was referring to this variation on the double slit experiment, rather than Schrodinger.