this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BendubzGaming@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's no different than Serbia or Croatia getting credit for it, both of which have happened

[–] ghostofkilgore@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Seems pretty obvious that none of the former Yugoslav states should be seen as 'inheritors' or successors to the old Yugoslavia national team. If you look through their old squds, it seems like a fairly even mix of nationalities in there.

[–] ConfusedCyndaquil@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

i mean personally i dont think any of them should really get those achievements, but technically doesnt all of yugoslavia’s footballing history legally belong to serbia?

somewhat unrelated, but did bosnians ever make up a majority of the yugoslav team, like how the ussr team was often majority ukranian? would def make sense to give them credit if they were like 50-60% of the squad, not so much if they were like 10-20%