this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
32 points (84.8% liked)

News

22896 readers
4058 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

BBC News - Alec Baldwin may be recharged with Rust gun death because of 'additional facts' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67141319

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The actor said at the time that he drew back the hammer on the pistol, but did not pull the trigger.

Charges were dropped […] after it was reported that the .45 Colt revolver had been modified with a new trigger in a way that could have made a misfire more likely.

Experts […] concluded there was no way for the gun to have been fired without the trigger being pulled.

[–] hiddengoat@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Prosecutors then had the replica gun forensically tested and had some parts of the weapon replaced after it was broken during the FBI's testing.

This is pretty much a mistrial right here, if it even gets that far. It would take barely more than zero effort to make the case that altering the firearm after the FBI's testing was enough to invalidate any results the prosecutors came up with.

I do not know why this is even a point that matters. He was on a set, in his capacity as an actor, blocking a scene with the cinematographer. This was a scene in which the gun was fired close to the camera. Him pulling the trigger was his job. The fact that the armorer did not do their fucking job and control live weapons on set is where the culpability actually is.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

On the mistrial, maybe, I think that would come down to what all was known about the weapon before it broke, and chain of custody, and a ton of stuff. Probably there'd be a whole investigation of the investigation of the gun.

As far as culpability, my gut reaction is to agree 100% with you. But I don't know all the details, and I'm not sure why a prosecutor would press charges if its so clearly not Baldwin's fault. Maybe there's some legal/financial/political benefit of putting it before a grand jury.

[–] hiddengoat@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is some speculation that the special prosecutors are right-wingers prosecuting known left-winger Baldwin. I find this stupid, and there's a much simple explanation.

The special prosecutors are two middling private attorneys who are now looking at being responsible for the prosecution of a very well known celebrity and getting a win on this means they look good in front of the DA. They will absolutely fight tooth and nail to get him convicted no matter how fucking flimsy the case is because it's politically expedient for them to win.

If you ever watched The Wire... winning this case gives them MAJOR suction with the DA.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Makes sense.

And yeah, watched it twice. Once on my own, and once again after my wife saw enough bits and pieces to want to watch the whole thing. Tangent, that's basically the story of my TV-viewing life. Wife won't start a show with me, but once I'm watching it, she'll inevitably end up seeing parts and idk... 75% of the time lately, she ends up wanting to watch the shows too.