this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
24 points (87.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53948 readers
391 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is HEVC (8-bit)/AAC a good, modern CODEC combination for rebuilding & reducing my library size without compromising quality? Helpful feedback would be appreciated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xionzui@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you’re concerned about quality, re-encoding from a lossy format to another lossy format is always going to lose more quality. Even if the format you choose would have been better quality if it was encoded directly from the source, the result is almost certainly going to look worse than what you have now.

[–] weedwhacking@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Exactly this, avoid re-encoding at all costs. Giant hard drives are real cheap these days

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

serverpartdeals.com

Certified refurbished drives. They're less reliable than new, but a hell of a lot cheaper. I've been running my Plex on a 14 TB.

Just beware of the sound levels of some of those drives.

[–] LocustOfControl@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Definitely, unless the original source was very inefficiently compressed, it's not worth the time, effort and quality loss to save a small amount of space.