this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
491 points (97.1% liked)

3DPrinting

15282 readers
56 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it's pointing at.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck? You dont even need that for buying a fucking knife

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think some people would say the ability to print a gun is more deadly then a knife.

But I kind of agree with you.

If we start licensing people to own stuff that has the potential to do harm, then eventually you are going to run into a never ending list of household items and laws of natural physics:

  • Bleach
  • Vinegar
  • Salt
  • Sugar
  • Chlorine
  • Gas
  • Natural gas
  • Methane
  • Fertilizers
  • Electricity
  • Paper
  • Fire
  • Propane
  • Etc.
[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

A surprising enlightening read. Thank you for sharing.

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

99% of the what I've seen is more deadly to the user than to anyone on the receiving end. You'd really be better off with a pipe pistol or shotgun.

But yeah, almost anything could be dangerous depending on how it's applied.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you've only seen the liberator and the harlot, the hoffman lowers and FGC9_2 0s? Well...

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Looked into the ones you mentioned, both require non-printed parts.

Those are better than what I had seen, but aren't even on the same scale as what someone can make with a mil or a lathe casually in a couple days

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Of course they do, but the serialized part that is run through NICs is printable, the rest you can order online or get at home depot.

Of course plastic, extruded or otherwise, is less strong than metal. That wasn't the question. You can get a good few thousand rounds out of those before they crack and when they do, they crack along a layer and are not "more dangerous for the user" by any stretch of the imagination.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Propane

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.