this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
1667 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59490 readers
4161 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Can't even seek through songs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 181 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Well, if you don't pay with money, you're paying with your attention. Do you think they create this huge service just for funsies?

Tbf, out of all media streaming services across movies, series, and music, Spotify has the highes bang-for-your-buck. It's still like Netflix at that time when there was only Netflix and you could watch almost everything on one platform. I still buy records that I like on physical media like vinyl, but Spotify is such a great deal for convenient listening to all music out there.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Man these people forget the days when a month of Spotify would afford you 1 CD. I remember cause I would spend half my paycheck on music. I'm just sitting here happy for services like Spotify and YouTube in my life. I remember a time when music and information was much harder to obtain (even illegally).

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But if you bought the CD you actually owned something. Stop paying for the services and you have nothing if all you used was spotify/YouTube/pandora. I gave up on paying for streaming years ago and spend the same amount monthly on purchasing music. I get CDs, either new or used. I’ve amassed a collection and I don’t need Internet or monthly charges to play them.

But I don't want to own it. I don't want to amass a collection of CDs taking up space somewhere. Been there, done that. I have a large collection of ripped mp3s from CDs I bought in the 90s and early 2000s (I've long since disposed of the physical media). I haven't clicked on a single one of them in years, I just keep them for nostalgia sake and because they take relatively little space.

I just occasionally want to listen to music sans commercials or annoying DJs wasting my time. For the cost of 1 CD a month my entire family can listen to almost anything they desire, at any time, without hassles (on Pandora in our case but I assume the economics are similar).

Same thing with movies, honestly. I watch them once and move on. There's a small handful I like enough to rewatch and I do own those.

I get the whole, we don't own anything anymore, argument and I mostly agree with it (see my massive Steam library). I just want both options to be viable. Streaming for ephemeral entertainment and actual ownership for the things I choose to keep.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We all have our preferences and I enjoy the quantity of music I can get in a heartbeat. It really sucked when you were 16 and spent $15 on a CD that sucked because there was no way to hear it ahead of time.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

My rule was always “buy it if there are at least 3 songs I know & like”. Only really had a few disappoint. I used to hang out at used CD stores though. I got so many for $2.50 or $5. Even a few gems for $1.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Valid point, but commuting with my turntable to listen to my sick vinyls on the go is a pain in the ass. Also moving sucks ass when you have a metric fuckton of sensitive vinyl to move. Owning stuff also has its downsides. Also no way I'm digitizing my vinyls and cutting them and shit to listen to them on the go, ain't nobody got time fo dat.

I gave up on CDs roughly 15 years ago because I don't like the format compared to vinyl (small album art, plasticy jewelcases, ...).

[–] small44@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

You owned the music when you buy it. With multiple backups the risks of losing it it very minimal but with spotify or other streaming services, if you have to reduce your expenses you completely lose the access to the music till you pay again. Spotify always grey out songs too so even when you pay you may not have access to the some of the music you want to listen to

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I feel you, the value from Spotify is enormous. I can sift through ten different bands in no time just because I decided that I want to look up a new genre that I may or may not be totally into by the end.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely you have a better explanation for why Spotify isn't giving you the full service for free.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah don't use it if you don't want to, idc. But you might accept the thought that there are people that think the deal Spotify puts on the table is good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I know not everyone will agree, but I think YouTube premium is the better bang-for-buck service. $3 more per month than Spotify and includes YouTube Music premium and YouTube Premium. So all the music and ad-free YouTube.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Except what YT Premium does is easily doable with free tools.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only so long as Google decides to continue serving content for free to people who contribute nothing to their bottom line, which isn't guaranteed to last.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone that thinks Google's WebDRM is going to stop with ads is a fool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*with free tools from thankless efforts.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can donate to projects you like tho

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Preach. I’d rather donate to those folks than give google money lawl

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An argument could easily be made for Spotify as well. There are plenty of options for streaming music for free to your device with download support. Just about anything can be done for free if people are willing.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

YT is just the more egregious example of this imo.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, for now. YouTube is cracking down on ad-blockers, don't think they'll let those free tools work forever...

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

YouTube is basically the same price as Spotify in my country (only 12 cents more actually), so even more bang for my buck, specially for family plans.

[–] CO_Chewie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I'm currently in a three month trial due to the value (music streaming and ad free you tube), but coming from Pandora YT Music's radio algorithm sucks sooooo bad. One of my first plays was a foo fighters album and now all the stations I create have alt/grunge in them. It's making it really hard to consider staying.

[–] shectabeni@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surprising to see any suggestions on here for YouTube Premium. I have been lucky enough to be on a family plan for years and it's honestly great. Sometimes, it's just easier not to deal with having to hack around things to make them usable.

[–] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Family is one of the biggest reasons. A huge part of it for me was minimizing at least SOME of the ads my kids would be exposed to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather vote for Deezer. Costs the same, but you also get lossless (16-bit 44.1kHz FLAC) audio.

By the way, free-mp3-download.net rips songs from Deezer. And if you don't like spending storage, you could self-host your own Navidrome server, though I get that may not be convenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)