this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
1203 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's ignoring the first part of his comment though. He said the ones that have merch stores and patreon pages. Not just getting YT money.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not accurate, they didn't say "charge creators who have their own sponsorships and merch stores" he said it as two separate statements "Charge creators" and "They have sponsorships and merch stores."

While we're on the topic, YT does already penalize people for videos that contain advertisements and have in the past put strikes videos that link to crowdfunding pages. Monetary fines for the larger pages might make sense, but idk how profitable it would be, especially if it gets contested in courts and adds legal fees.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would make sense to charge some channels for being on the platform. A good example in my feed is Banks Power. They make their money selling turbos and other stuff to WT. Then they come to YT and build brand precense basically for free. YT deserves some of the money generated from being a cheap advertising platform imo.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So we're thinking some sort of self reported income bracket? Or maybe if the channel gets deemed as a primarily advertisement channel? How do you define it in a way that doesn't negatively impact the good actors and entertainers?

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Right it would be hard to implement. It's just one of the types of channels I don't think should be getting income from ads because it is an ad. Realistically it's much easier to not bother making more rules that are expensive to implement.