this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
534 points (89.0% liked)

Curated Tumblr

3807 readers
125 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):

-web

-iOS

-android

Please begin copied raw text posts (lacking a screenshot that makes it apparent it is from Tumblr) with:

# This has been reposted here to Lemmy as part of the "Curated Tumblr Project."

I made the icon using multiple creative commons svg resources, the banner is this.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xeekei@lemm.ee 59 points 11 months ago (6 children)

This is why "/s" was invented, no matter how silly it might seem.

Because human skulls are thick af.

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They're actually quite thin, like a shark's smooth skin.

[–] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's the brain that is smooth tbh, not the skin

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I believe it's actually very scratchy. Like sandpaper.

[–] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No no you're wrong, every surgeon I know said it's smooth as silk.

[–] Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I use human brains to finish off my woodworking. They're very coarse, like sandpaper

[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

Skin as thin as their skulls are thick.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

No, they're thick from all angles.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

It's funnier this way.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

After a commentor stated that Planned Parenthood only uses a tiny bit of their budget for abortions, I linked this:

https://www.theonion.com/planned-parenthood-opens-8-billion-abortionplex-1819572640

The number of lemmings who thought I was serious... jesus.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

The fuck? This is completely messed up. I cannot agree with the bullshit "facts" stated in this article. 8 billion only netted 8 million terminated unborn lives? Almost $1000 per is definitely not "efficient."

Lemme know when you get below $100 per.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

So far I feel like people here are a tad more gullible than reddit ever was. Didn't think it was possible.

[–] blivet@artemis.camp 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m old enough to have been an adult when the internet was first opened up to the general public. I remember guides to writing email that stressed that you should be careful using irony or sarcasm, that the tone was very difficult to convey. I don’t know what it could be, but there seems to be something about online communication that makes it next to impossible to use such devices.

[–] technojamin@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s because sarcasm is usually indicated with vocal intonations, which is lost in text.

[–] blivet@artemis.camp 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but for some reason there doesn't seem to be the same difficulty in print. I don't recall any warnings about the use of sarcasm or irony in style guides before the internet era, and no one seemed to feel the need for anything like "/s".

[–] technojamin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

That’s a really good point. I would guess that this has to do with how the medium of the internet makes it more difficult to detect the author’s intent. Pre-internet, most writing was read from books, newspapers, and magazines. With each of these, the reader usually has a good idea of the author’s tone. Going in, the reader is usually familiar with the subject, and I’m guessing that longer texts give the reader more time and context to detect the tone.

This is all pretty different on the internet, where shorter, user-generated content (mostly written by people who aren’t amazing writers) reigns supreme. When reading comments in a thread or flipping through posts, the reader switches between different authors with their different tones much quicker than in earlier mediums. It makes sense that people would get tripped up more often.

That’s all just ideas, though. I’d love to see some scientific study on this kind of stuff.

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

"Oh sure, that's a great idea." he said sarcastically.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Lack of nonverbal queues/tone and lack of context. It's easier to convey sarcasm through text if you're chatting with someone you know well. But online, you're often talking to near strangers, and you don't know if they're the type to find this kind of thing hilarious among other beliefs.

[–] deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

/s takes any grain of humour of of everything. Ambiguity is an important part of communication.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Well that's a stupid little take, you must communicate in exhaustive detail while on the internet. It's in the rules!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I'm pretty sure that /s was outlawed by the internet elders in 2021.