this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
1203 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I suspect ad blocking will always be an arms race. The server can only ask the client to play the ad, and then rely on the client to truthfully report whether it did so.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm sure they'll try to implement some type of DRM BS into the web that allows them. It's one of the good things about projects like Gemini. I used to think it was only good for the novelty of having a web alternative protocol.

No doubt Big Tech would lobby for Microsoft to use Windows to flag Gemini browsers as malicious and then run FUD campaigns against the Gemini protocol

[–] ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

I’m sure they’ll try to implement some type of DRM BS into the web

Funny you say that:

https://www.techdirt.com/2023/08/02/googles-plan-to-drm-the-web-goes-against-everything-google-once-stood-for/

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Y'all remember when back in the day, Google's motto was "don't be evil." And then at some point somebody told them how much money there was in being evil and then they just pivoted to being a functional parody of a giant evil megacorporation from a cyberpunk novel? Cuz I remember that.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It still doesn't stop queueing a few videos ahead of time and watching them though, let it play the ad to noone and just cut it out after

[–] MR_GABARISE@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But then you'll get prompts for "What product did you just watch an ad for?"

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

"Drink verification can."

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They already do this on the YouTube TV app

It's amazing how many times someone in this thread has joked about Google doing something absurd sounding only for it to already be true.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

You have to be careful with that sort of thing - some percentage of people who do watch the ads will close the tab rather than read the prompt and answer it.

[–] shamrock@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s only a matter of time before they start embedding them into the video like podcasts do and you won’t be able tell the difference between ad and video with software.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Timestamps can still be voluntarily marked for an auto-skip feature to jump throughthe ads.

[–] shamrock@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not if YouTube interjects the ad after uploading and the location is randomized.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

That's why there pushing Web Environment Integrity (essentially just DRM for the entire internet)