this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
289 points (96.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5057 readers
101 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
289
I Study Climate Change. The Data Is Telling Us Something New. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's so much wrong with comments starting with "So you ...".

Yes, I'm not a climate scientist. I don't have the time and energy to read all the relevant papers, nor do I need to do so to participate in the discussion on Lemmy. Sometimes I do, but I'm not obliged to, and you're not in a position to judge.

It's great though that you read the paper. Can you support your claim with quotes from it? After all, I don't trust random dudes.