this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
146 points (92.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40394 readers
385 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've always hated the idea of using a subscription/cloud hosting for password management. I feel like I should have a LOT more control over that stuff and I don't really want to hand all my keys over to a company.

All my secrets have been going in a highly encrypted archive with a long passphrase, but obviously that isn't convenient on all devices. It's been fine, I can open it on any computer but it's not super quick. It does have the advantage of being able to put in multiple files, notes, private keys but it's not ideal.

Anyway, finally found something that isn't subscription, and has a similar philosophy - a highly encrypted archive file, and it's open source and has heaps of clients including web browser plugins so it's usable anywhere, and you can sync the vault with any file sync you like.

Thought you guys might appreciate the find, password managers have always been a bit of a catch 22 for me.

Note for android i found keepassxc the best app, and i'm using KeePassHelper browser plugin, and the KeePassXc desktop app as well as the free official one. Apps all seem to be cross platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shadowbert@kbin.social 73 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I personally prefer bitwarden, using a self-hosted vaultwarden. It's free, it syncs, it's easy to use.

[–] techognito@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Passphrase generator, simplelogin/addy.io integration and sync.

This makes my life so much easier.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Same, and the apps work great.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to use keepassxc for years. Kept it synced with sync thing, though eventually work blocked networking with sync thing so I swapped to vaultwarden and never been happier.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why sync your passwords from home with your work computer? Just keep them on your phone.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could see it being tedious if you had to manually enter long, random string passwords regularly. Though I suppose you could change them to something easier to type. Ctrl+shift+L (bitwarden extension autofill shortcut) is just so much more convenient.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Why enter personal passwords on work computers so frequently?

This sounds like an underlying assumption of how time is being spent rather than a technical issue.

25+ character passwords that change frequently, at least in my case.

[–] bazmatazable@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recently made the switch to Vaultwarden when I read a series of articles making predictions about passkeys and how they are lining up to replace passwords. Bitwarden apparently is ready to implement whatever standard becomes most popular and I had FOMO of being left behind if I stuck with keepass only. Previously I was using various keepass compatible apps and then syncing the KDBX database with my Nextcloud. (Vaultwarden is the selfhosted fork of Bitwarden)

[–] lue3099@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Vaultwarden isnt a fork because bitwarden isn't selfhostable. Bitwarden has an official selfhosted version. Vaultwarden is a lightweight rust version of the backend. As the selfhosted version by bitwarden is quite fat. Vaultwarden uses the official webapp of the webvault in their fork.