this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
53 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19522 readers
128 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] tdawg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly refactoring everything isn't an "improvement." More often than not it's a sign of that developer not understanding what the code does. Which is fine if they need to do that in a new code base or are otherwise rather green. Writing code is easier than reading it, after all. However they really should stash those changes or reopen a new branch after that exploratory phase.

IMO (in general) a good bug fix makes the smallest possible change to implement said fix. Otherwise the focus is about documention of the bug if needed and some minor refactoring to improve readability, consistency, or efficency

[โ€“] ngcbassman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like the approach of when finding a bug, write a test to reproduce it, fix the bug so the test passes, next do whatever refactoring you want because you have a test passing :)