this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eustatics@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Think I saw a Spanish player tap someone there. Should be ruled out

[–] Revihx@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Was the Spanish player offside?

[–] universalremonster--@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why people keep saying this, it was announced as a disallowed goal for a foul and the on-field ref made the hand signal for foul.

This was not disallowed for offsides.

[–] Frideric@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Always a solid basis.

[–] moonski@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

it was initially ruled a foul though

[–] Embarrassed-Gas-8155@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

An offside being reviewed on the monitor? Seems a bit weird.

[–] Gonchuago@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I think it’s the interference with the play that is reviewable, the offside is clear for the VAR team, the question is : does the Scottish player do enough to interfere with the play? Up to debate I guess

[–] Kanesy99@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The goal was initially denied for a foul, the referee even signalled as such when he called it off. For them to now say now it was disallowed for offside is complete pish because they fucked it initially