this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32296 readers
707 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Policy like regulating those 100 corporations?

[–] DreamerOfImprobableDreams@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. I said so explicitly in my previous comment.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems odd to say

And don't @ me about "100 corporations are responsible for like 90% of emissions". Who's buying those corporations' goods?

People bringing up the 100 corporations are usually calling for regulations on them, and the "you're the ones buying the goods" people are usually calling for Personal Responsibility and Voting With Your Wallet.

[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s possible to both think those companies should be regulated and that people are doing almost nothing personally to help, including electing people to enact those policies. For most people I talk to the “but 100 corps” is a total deflection of personal responsibility. This crisis will not be solved without a good heaping helping of both personal responsibility and aggressive government regulation. If nothing else because that aggressive regulation will never pass into law unless people acknowledge their personal responsibility and are willing to accept the sacrifices that will come with it.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

In the US, unless you are willing to vote third party, you don't get the choice to vote for Anti-Capitalist politicians. And there are millions of liberals waiting in line to scold you for not voting for the parties of Capital.