this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1564 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

60048 readers
2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] porkins@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We have plenty of nuclear fuel and waste is a drop in an ocean compared to that of fossil fuels.

[–] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep. This is why I'm annoyed the UK is dumping its money into oil and coal fuel sources. We need more Nuclear plants and we should have started building these yesterday.

[–] kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The best time to ~~plant a tree~~ build a nuclear power plant was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

[–] Acid@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

Tory government investing in nuclear energy?

Nah boris and his lot would rather get bungs from the local lads and keep us in the dark ages.

Labour aren’t exactly gonna do it either with Tory lite candidates atm. We are well and truly proper fucked.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd prefer it if my nuclear waste doesn't drip into the ocean, please /s

[–] porkins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I asked for that. In a manner-of-speaking, if you compared by the football field filled in area with barrels of waste. It would be about one for all the annual nuclear waste where turning the byproduct of combustible fossil fuels into just the vapor and ash equivalent would fill thousands. It arguably wouldn’t win from a toxicity perspective. For all the waste in the ocean from Fukushima, the only outcome were that the marine life seemed to have thrived off the low-level radiation.