this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
138 points (97.3% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54411 readers
218 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I used both this and yt-dlp for downloading albums. This seems smoother since it has a UI.
CLI>GUI
Nah, it's a matter of personnal preferences and use case.
I love CLI mainly because it allows me to sceipt suff, but lots of people don't mind actually seeing what they are doing and clicking on stuff to achieve it.
It's a good news there are piracy tools with a CLI, makes it more accessible to more people - and we should rejoice about it.
Executable with GUI and supplied CLI executable.
Best of both worlds.
For lots of archiving you want scripting. Same for whole albums of songs (i assume every song one item).
That is why cli>gui. In other use cases gui is better (complex video editing via ffmpeg alone would be interesting for example). And then there is jdownloader :(
Imo, the more complex and visual a task, the more likely it is for a gui to be preferable.