this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
752 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

10970 readers
2100 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'll be shocked to learn that the distance in Kelvin is also adjusted to water "chemistry", albeit changing the aggregate state seems more physics to me, since no molceules are reacting with each other.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully that has been redefined using the Boltzmann constant, so now anyone in the universe can agree on °C and K without needing to measure any Vienna standard ocean water.

[–] _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

I was going to make a joke about how Austria is landlocked, how did we come up with the idea of making an ocean water standard.

Apparently the IAEA which is headquartered here set that standard, for anyone else curious.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't change the aggregate state of a single molecule, or how do you mean that? Excluding plasma.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you can of a lot of molecules though. and tgat is classically "physics" rather than "chemistry". Classical chemistry is reactiona between atoms or molecules to form new ones.

If you get deeper into it, the lines between chemistry and physics blur anyways.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, now I understand your previous comment. My reading error, thanks.