this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
649 points (93.6% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2390 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Of all generational cohorts, older millennials are most likely to generate enough income to retire comfortably, according to the latest Vanguard Retirement Readiness report.

Specifically, millennials aged 37-41 have the greatest chance of landing a comfortable retirement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“…expected cuts to Social Security benefits materialize…”

Um, how about no? What if, instead, we taxed the billionaires, or simply raid their offshore accounts, to fund the program? If corporate media didn’t removed about it on their behalf, would they even notice?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we don't put a cap on how much people put into social security each year so that it isn't impacted as much by income inequality.

It wouldn't solve the inequality, but it would reduce the impact on social security.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

This is a very reasonable approach. Would be great if we could lift the estate tax cap while we’re at it, 11mil is a joke!