this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
93 points (89.1% liked)

Videos

14085 readers
465 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
  4. Don't be a jerk
  5. No advertising
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jode@midwest.social 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Also it's insultingly expensive. I had an opportunity to do it for a work trip but couldn't justify the thousands of dollars vs the way cheaper and quicker flight.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 11 months ago

Honestly, taking a transcontinental train is less a form of transit and more kind of land cruise.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The slower speed is why it’s so expensive. Instead of employing a pilot, co-pilot, and flight attendants for a few hours, you have to employ engineers, conductors, and car attendants for days. Labor is one of any business’s highest expenses, and when you require 10x as much for the same result…

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think you forgot to factor airports, ground crew, atc, and federal flight infrastructure in

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It’s roughly equivalent to maintaining train stations (some of which see less than one train, per direction, per day), FRA oversight, rental fees to the host railroad outside of the limited tracks Amtrak owns, locomotive and car maintenance, etc.

Wendover broke down the numbers a few years ago, I don't think they've changed significantly since then.