this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
97 points (96.2% liked)

Privacy

31914 readers
563 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under the pretense of fortifying digital security in the United States, newly proposed legislation seeks to transform the United States Postal Service (USPS) into a hub for digital IDs. Senators Ron Wyden, a Democrat, and Bill Cassidy, Republican, have put forth the bill known as the Post Office Services for Trustworthy Identity Act. The proposed legislation opens new discourse on digital privacy and the potential for abnormal surveillance measures, sparking debate over the delicate balance between biosecurity and preserving citizens’ fundamental rights.

We obtained a copy of the bill for you here [PDF].

The proposed legislation comes in response to the piecemeal approach taken towards biometric identification in America. Historically, disjointed programs have been created by different states and separate agency undertakings, giving rise to the necessity for a more coherent national strategy. The Post Office Services for Trustworthy Identity Act could mark a landmark shift, focusing on service provision rather than overarching digital ID strategy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We definitely do need one. Right now it's a hodge podge of crap that wasn't meant to be an identifier and it makes identity theft easy, and our privacy isn't even being protected because we still have an SSN and tax ID.

Having worked in the medical space, a lack of identifier is actually a huge issue that causes problems for people daily, especially people changing their names for whatever reason.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it would be better to do everything with accounts that are not necessarily permanently connected to a person's identity. Any government mediated, definitive system for identifying people is way too risky from a general privacy and freedom perspective.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government can already identify you, and your identity is easy to steal. Making a better ID system just removes the identity theft issue.

The other nice thing would be you could use the id number instead of your name so you can stop giving your PII out to every business. Just "here's my ID number, bill my insurance, you don't need anything else."

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government can already identify you, and your identity is easy to steal.

Fixing both of these problems would be better than just one.

[–] __init__@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The issue is that the surveillance state is actively bad, and expanding it and making it more official is a much bigger problem than the problem of ill-conceived verification systems, which could be better solved other ways. I don't want things to be perfect, I want to prioritize moving away from a dystopian panopticon.