this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
410 points (94.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
736 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] hottari@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A simple yay -Sy from Arch btw takes less computing power and doesn't depend on an external dependency.

    [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Any reason not to just use yay? That's an alias for yay -Syu, which in and of itself, at least if I understood it correctly, is basically just pacman -Syu and from what I've read on the arch wiki -Sy is heavily discouraged.

    [–] hottari@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    yay in the example was used to install an AUR; not to update the system which is what you are talking about. And the discouragement you speak of -Sy applies only to pacman upgrades, not AUR helpers. The only reason the y is discouraged in the wiki when installing a package is because it fetches updated data from the repos which might lag the rest of the system (and potentially the resulting dependencies if any). Most of the time it is not a concern as most (quality) software is made to be backwards compatible anyway.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    But then you stuck with arch. I've never had any software that wasn't a flatpak or in the Debian repos. I use Fedora.

    [–] hottari@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    I would say you are stuck on Fedora too, what is your point?

    I’ve never had any software that wasn’t a flatpak or in the Debian repos.

    There are quite a number of them, hence the reason for OP's meme.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Really? I honestly have never had that problem. Can you name a few? (I'm completely serious. Don't take this as sarcasm)

    [–] hottari@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

    There are so many software devs that package AURs because Arch has made it easy for them to do so. No need to give examples if you are totally fine with your brand of distro.

    But whether you'll hit the minor snag OP memes about depends on your software needs.