this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
532 points (94.8% liked)
World News
32300 readers
371 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't think they have a launch vehicle capable of performing anywhere close to the $/ton launch cost do they?
So, historically, NASA doesn't really make their launch vehicles, any more than the US Army makes their tanks. They buy from the lowest bidder who can meet the mission specs and then modify to purpose.
It's obviously a lot more complicated than that but the point is, "NASA's" cost overruns are contractor overruns that in large part are a symptom of a deliberately sabotaged system.
Tl;Dr the launch schedule should be controlled by NASA, with the rockets they own, purchased from the manufacturer that can meet their specs, not leased from an unreliable fascist.
If Elon can sell the best rockets, so be it, or Northrup, or Blue Origin, or whoever, but right now they're basically being forced into a subscription service for missions.
lol elon a fascist? I guess we are fucked.
https://news.yahoo.com/elon-musk-attacked-german-support-195538777.html
So facism 2.0 will be in germany, but with a remote dictator. I guess that says a lot more about germans than anything else.