this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
228 points (97.5% liked)

News

23268 readers
2558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Connecticut’s most wide-ranging gun control measure since the 2013 law enacted after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting takes effect Sunday, with proponents vowing to pursue more gun legislation despite legal challenges happening across the country.

The new law, signed by Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont in June, bans the open carrying of firearms and prohibits the sale of more than three handguns within 30 days to any one person, with some exceptions for instructors and others.

“We will not take a break and we cannot stop now, and we will continue to pass life-saving laws until we end gun violence in Connecticut. Our lives depend on it,” said Jeremy Stein, executive director of Connecticut Against Gun Violence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nezrock@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This law is going to be struck down as unconstitutional almost immediately.

If they're going to ban open carry, they need to remove all fees and procedures (prints, etc) for obtaining a concealed carry permit. Otherwise, it only serves to disenfranchise poorer people.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Odd that it could be struck down as unconstitutional since CT banned open carry when the Constitution and Bill of Rights were passed.

Edit: It was actually Rhode Island that did although Connecticut did pass gun control measures in the early 1800s.

[–] nezrock@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The right to bear arms for self defense is in enshrined in the Connecticut Constitution, with no explicit or implied exceptions.

The US Supreme Court ruled last year, that, quote, "Americans have a constitutional right to carry a firearm in public places, arguing that a century-old New York law requiring a 'proper cause' to carry a gun outside of the home is a violation of Second Amendment rights."

That case they ruled on is from when New York tried to do the same thing (setting a precedent).

The law is in outright defiance of the latest Supreme Court interpretation, and the Connecticut Constitution.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Let's not pretend the Supreme Court gives a shit about precedent even if it is recent. Conservatives killed that idea.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aren't poorer people the ones who do more crime?

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure. How many poor people were working in the financial sector when the banks misrepresented the value of mortgage backed securities and sold them to pension funds?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fine. If you narrowly define crime as that which involves a gun I am fairly confident you will find that it relates to income levels.

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Crimes” of despair added in maybe, maybe not. Things are criminalized that enough money means not really (epstein’s island), privacy to snort/smoke/inject drugs of choice, solicit sexual services; bribes, embezzlement, tax evasion; and not all crimes are equal, nor should be criminal.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are multiple orders of magnitude more poor people, and per capita they commit more gun crimes than the rich.

Surely this is due to desperation and lack of opportunity and minimal access to mental health care. But we're not fixing any of that, are we.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe the rich can afford to have their gun crimes committed for them?

But we’re not fixing any of that, are we.

Of course not. Perhaps because it would work?