literature.cafe meta

215 readers

1 users here now

Literature.cafe's meta community for announcements, requests, bug reports. etc etc.

Please follow the instance's rules

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

gabe

Arthur

Next update... should we federate with NSFW instances? (self.meta)

submitted 1 year ago by gabe to c/meta

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, a lot of features are coming next update to help alleviate some of the annoyance of federating with NSFW instances.

For context, I defederated from the NSFW instances because they clutter the absolute FUCK out of /all. I mainly anticipated federating with them in time when it could be hidden from /all, but domain blocks seem to be coming next update at least as well as disabling remote image caching.

Would yall be ok if I refederated? Or should we wait a bit more for community silencing and hiding as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CaptObvious 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Is there a universal definition of NSFW? I can imagine instances that would call beach scenes NSFW where less conservative groups would have no problem with them. It changes the calculus, IMO.

What’s your take on the question?

[–] gabe 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Porn.

[–] Eq0 2 points 1 year ago

I remember particularly gory news feeds also being NSFW, so it’s not only porn and erotica that can fall under that tag.

Are the NSFW tags given by the author of the post? Then the benchmark is going to be different depending on the poster: from naked boobs being tagged to more explicit content not being considered NSFW.

I am personally happy with not seeing NSFW content, I come here for books, memes and political discussion, I would hide NSFW posts asap anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)