this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

17408 readers
95 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His golden parachute value is tied to the stock value of the company, so of course he doesn't care about long term projections, only short term while he's still at the company for a couple years.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This perverse incentive has been brought to you by....

Capitalism! ✨

[–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ah yes the same evil capitalism that:

  1. Allowed SO to exist in the first place
  2. Have market incentive to get anywhere near as good as they once were

Do you have a better system in mind?

[–] foo@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stack overflow could only generate and moderate its content through collectivism.

[–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content?

[–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country.

[–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof.

Edit:

To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes:

  1. The collapse of the country.
  2. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China.
  3. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea.

Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system.

Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago

Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion.

Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym.