Firefox

20372 readers

169 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

171

Mozilla and the burning need for clients for power users (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 years ago by jsdz@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mozilla seems to be asleep at the wheel, when it once drove online activity and communications. We have some suggestions where it could go.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Personally I think they should revive Positron, their electron competitor, with the launch of Servo. If it has the same benefits of Firefox vs Chrome, I think people would love apps that are on the slimmer side

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't see the point, especially when there's Tauri, which is a slim wrapper around whatever the default web view is on the target platform. That's about as slim as you can get.

Mozilla making it would merely be a Firefox-based Electron competitor, which would probably end up being similar in terms of size. I think that should happen, but the goal shouldn't be to make apps slimmer, but to make a real Electron competitor (i.e. something that packages the browser with the executable).

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I've never heard of Tauri before. It's almost exactly what I would hope for from mozilla, and perfect for some of the apps I want to make. Ty!

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're welcome! I'm actually in the process of pitching it to my company to replace our Electron app, which has caused a bunch of problems for us.

[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you have a pros and cons between tauri and electron? Thank you

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I'll just describe how they work, and you can decide the pros and cons for yourself.

Electron:

bundles browser with the app, so the dev can control exactly the version of the browser they're shipping
language is JavaScript
quite stable from a development perspective

Tauri:

uses system browser (Edge on Windows, Safari on macOS), so the browser gets updated with the system, not the app
language is Rust
younger project, but it's also a relatively simple project

I want to move our app to Tauri because:

we need to refactor anyway because recent versions of Electron break our app
install size is large, and we could refactor the web app to be offline-ready instead of relying on Electron features
Tauri gets security updates for the browser "for free," so we could have our app "auto update" by just being a PWA
if we add desktop-specific features (e.g. move some of our computation to the FE), it won't be in JS, so Rust offers better options (i.e. threading)

So since we don't need the features Electron offers, I want to use Tauri to reduce our maintenance overhead.