this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
721 points (90.4% liked)

Games

16707 readers
770 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] golli@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

One aspect through which one could argue that they might stifle competition is their price parity rule, for which it seems they are being sued. See here (not sure if there is any new development.

Hard to compete with steam if you cant at least do it through lower pricing. Although this article suggests that at least for epic exclusives publisher seem to prefer to just pocket the difference, rather than pass on those savings.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't that just saying you can't sell access to a game on steam (through a steam key) for a lower price than what's on Steam? It's not like they can't just offer a lower price... just that they can't offer it for a lower price bundled with Steam access.

So they can offer a lower price, just not as a third party through Steam itself.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I think you are right, the first article I linked was a bit ambiguous about it, but rereading the second one it seems that I misunderstood it and you are right.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

If it was only about Steam Keys, there wouldn't have been a lawsuit.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If that's the case, why do people use sites like humble bundle when they could individually buy the games from steam?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

Humble Bundle has a special relationship with Valve iirc, because of the charity work they do.

[–] Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe it means base price and not sale prices. It's fine for a game to go on sale for lower than Steam, but the base price can't be $60 Steam $50 Epic as an example.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

That is also allowed, but not if Epic purchase allows you to play the game on steam too

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

No it means that if the game is for sale on Steam then it can be sold elsewhere (GOG, EPIC...) but it's in the contract with Steam that it can't be sold for a lower price elsewhere, it's not about Steam keys sold by third party vendors.