this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
765 points (99.4% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

3062 readers
512 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is what I mean when I say Kant (and other enlightenment era thinkers) obsession with some universal moral rules followed by purely rational humans is some dude’s fantasy who never has understood how normal people work.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was about to defend him but after refreshing my memory and reading about the Categorical Imperative I think you’re absolutely right.

[–] zzx@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's that? I liked the ideas in the first half of "a critique of pure reason"

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago

"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

It's basic and kinda neat as a personal moral philosophy.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Kant is not really like other Enlightenment era thinkers though.