this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
135 points (91.4% liked)

Linux

56331 readers
754 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also why does everyone seem to hate on Ubuntu?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's funny because I see the same cult behavior, but for Fedora. I've never understood the point of this distribution that has never worked well for me.

I'm on Manjaro by the way, because I love everything about Arch except the release style.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Funnily enough, I feel the opposite. Manjaro never worked reliably for me, but Fedora works great for my use case. Is it perfect? Fuck if I know. But it's a good, no-nonsense, extremely low maintenance, super reliable distro that I use daily with zero issues.

Also, they pioneered the atomic distro concept that has amazing use cases, and some fantastic projects are based on this technology. My gaming PC runs Bazzite for a zero-maintenance, immediate gaming experience. My dads laptop runs Bluefin and he hasn't broken it yet, and he's capable of breaking every single OS.

Same.

That said, never heard of fedora being a cult at all. Hell I feel it gets far less recognition than it should honestly for being cutting edge and stable.

[–] exu@feditown.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Manjaro release style is holding back everything (yes, also critical security updates) for two weeks. How is that better than getting the updates?

[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not a fan of getting updates every single day, sometimes breaking little things. I prefer less frequent homogeneous and tested releases.

[–] exu@feditown.com 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

But you're still getting updates every day, just two weeks later than Arch. The "testing" is just two other branches somewhat closer to the Arch package releases.

https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Switching_Branches

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Just update weekly. It's an easy fix.

[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Usually, the stable branch is updated every 2 weeks or so. Look at the past releases: https://forum.manjaro.org/c/announcements/stable-updates/12

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

This must be why you also chose the Lemmy shit just works instance lol

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago

I'm using Fedora, but I'm not going to say it's my favorite. I liked MX and OpenSUSE a lot. Just had a hard time with running them on a computer. Fedora just worked out the box.