this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
386 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12496 readers
1327 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam"

Source: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114784170652465525

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

I’m so confused? Why would Vietnam agree to a one sided “free” trade agreement.

Assuming trump has wildly oversimplified the details to sound better than they are.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because they get cheaper tariffs on exports to the US, in the knowledge that they don’t want to import much at all from the US, so it makes Trump think he has something when he has nothing.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

VinFast is state owned and gets a pile of subsidies on every vehicle sold. There's also piles of taxes and regulations applied to other vehicles. The US vehicles will be uncompetitive.

[–] the_wise_wolf@feddit.org 23 points 2 days ago

For Vietnam a bad deal is probably better than no deal. But also, don't believe anything Trump says.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

He's got an extensive history of lying about (among so many things) what so-and-so told him in a private meeting, only to be called out and contradicted by that very person the following day.

Throw another one on the pile, most likely.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

US goods will be cheaper in Vietnam compared to other countries in the region. US companies will be more likely to invest in Vietnam compared to other countries in the region. If 20% is low relative to where their regional competitors end up it's not a bad deal. I don't think a lot of US produced goods compete with local products so its not likely to cause domestic industry much problems.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Quite a few companies in China have been outsourcing to Vietnam to avoid tariffs during the first Trump administration. They didn't reverse course after the Biden administration increased tariffs further.

Even if Trump didn't touch the 25% special tariff on Chinese goods, 20% alone justifies doing so.

[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

Until he changes his mind next week.

[–] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I suspect they are “caving” a lot like Mexico and Canada “caved” earlier-the request made is already fulfilled.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Some countries are caving to US on war. Some on trade. VN was threatened with 46% tariffs. The 40% transhipment rate is something easily avoided. I doubt VN will import more from US. VN making a deal can still provide best value apparel to US