science

20201 readers

381 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

109

RFK Jr.’s health department calls Nature “junk science,” cancels subscriptions (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 week ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Kennedy's criticism largely stems from his belief that modern medicine and mainstream science are part of a global conspiracy to generate pharmaceutical profits. Kennedy is a germ-theory denier who believes people can maintain their health not by relying on evidence-based medicine, such as vaccines, but by clean living and eating—a loose concept called "terrain theory."

Access to top scientific and medical journals is essential for federal scientists to keep up to date with their fields and publicize high-impact results. One NIH employee added to Nature news that it "suppresses our scientific freedom, to pursue information where it is present."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't Nature one of the most reputable science magazines..

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Yes, that is why captain brain worms opposes it.

[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's generally between Science and Nature in terms of greatest publication prestige. Most scientists work their butts off to get their works published in either of those, only to get their work desk-rejected and ultimately published in "less prestigious", field-specific journals.

That's not to say the Science and Nature are the end all be all of scientific journals; there are many journals specific to each field that is also prestigious.