this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
-4 points (40.9% liked)

Political Memes

8721 readers
2772 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The strongest period of the civil war has ended (probably), but there's still ongoing Assadist insurgencies, and the control of the state over the innumerable militias and paramilitaries, which it did not control before the Assad regime fell, is far from solid. Back in May, for example, Assadist paramilitaries committed a massacre of Sunni Muslims, and shortly thereafter, local paramilitaries committed a counter-massacre of Alawites. The central government has formally condemned this, but its power to restrict this ongoing violence remains limited - and, in all truth, it's probably less interested in restricting massacres in pro-Assad areas than in anti-Assad areas.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know how to respond to this but to say I'm anti-assad? This feels pretty clear cut

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's muddy insofar as the government's responsibility for, control over, and actual effort put forward to restrain sectarian reprise-killings is in question. Officially, they've come out strongly against it, and realistically, they probably have little control.

However, some believe, not without reason, that they aren't particularly interested in restraining the reprise-killings, either out of the belief that it will suppress Assadist insurgents, or out of spite against Alawite communities which supported Assad.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The central government has formally condemned this

The Reuters investigation proved this to be patently false. They organized those death squads.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From your own link:

President al-Sharaa has ordered a committee to investigate the violence and set up “civil peace” mediations.

Yasser Farhan, the spokesperson of the committee, said the president will receive its findings in two weeks as the committee is currently analyzing information then writing its final report based on testimonies and information gathered from over 1,000 people, in addition to briefings from officials and interrogations of detainees. He advised Reuters against publishing its findings before the report's release.

“We are unable to provide any responses before completing this process in respect for the integrity of the truth,” he said, adding, “I expect that you will find the results useful, and that they uncover the truth."

One official of the new government, Ahmed al-Shami, the governor of Tartous province, told Reuters that Alawites are not being targeted. He acknowledged “violations” against Alawite civilians, and estimated around 350 people died in Tartous, in line with what Reuters also found. That figure has never been published by the government.

“The Alawite sect is not on any list, black, red or green. It’s not criminalized and it’s not targeted for retaliation. The Alawites faced injustice just like the rest of the Syrian people in general” under Assad, the governor said. “The sect needs safety. It’s our duty as a government which we will work on.”

In a sign of the government’s tenuous control over its own fighters, newly integrated factions faced off in village streets at times, according to witnesses in three different locations who all described seeing one side trying to protect bewildered civilians from uniformed men trying to kill them.

But I understand that reading your own links is a bit too much effort for you to put in. Why bother with that when you have a narrative to peddle?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe read more than a quarter of the article. But I understand it's a bit much effort for someone like you.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Aw, someone's mad that it was pointed out that their own source disproves their point.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It's funny you think I'm mad, I'm just disappointed there are people like you around here.

Try to work on your reading comprehension and maybe in a couple years you can read through the whole article again.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

I’m just disappointed there are people like you around here.

People with basic reading comprehension?

Yes, I suppose that must be deeply disappointing for people who want to peddle thought-free narratives.