this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
744 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12287 readers
2791 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Given it's targeting businesses violating a city ordinance that's in place to reduce pollution, I don't see an issue with it. If it was people snitching on other citizens for minor violations or something, I'd be against it.

I guess the qualifier for me is, is the law something that's in place for public good? If so, it should be enforced.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I guess the qualifier for me is, is the law something that's in place for public good? If so, it should be enforced.

That's supposed to be the case for every law.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, but it's also a pandoras box IMO.