this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
515 points (90.9% liked)

Selfhosted

48329 readers
1620 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried testing a movie from my home server in plex through firefox and repeatedly got this message, even after reloading.

I knew that they had paywalled the apps on mobile and streaming from outside the network but now they have also blocked watching your own movies through your own hardware.

I do get the point that making software should be able to sustain people but I dont see the move of plex as a fair thing to do. Yes, they have made great software but taking your home server hostage feels like the wrong move.

Even a pop up that says "we need you to donate please" would have been fine. make it pop up before every movie, play donation ads before any movie but straight up disabling the app is kinda cruel.

Anyway, i have switched to jellyfin and it is insanely good. please give it a try. you can run it alongside plex with not issues (at least i had none) and compare the two.

In any case, good luck. Let me know if you need help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe I was thinking of this from back in 2024?

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin-android/issues/123

"Hacking around with a reverse proxy is strongly discouraged and we won't provide any support for it."

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah part of doing this is keeping a ci pipeline up and unit testing against rcs and telling them exactly what's failing. The report in that ticket gave them absolutely no choice but to try to set up an entire system to reproduce whatever the user did which they obviously don't want to do.

WebSocket relays are poorly implemented in a lot of proxies, Even cloudflare has its fair share of issues.

The downside of using HA is reinventing the let's encrypt pipeline for the 40th time, the upside is it's dead simple, web sockets go in, web sockets go out, The logs are good, it's easy to debug it with TCP dump If things start to get sketchy.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How can you debug it with a TCP dump if it's encrypted?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

You are doing the https unwrapping in tf/HA proxy. It's clear text between the proxy process and the JF server

You can do a dump off the entire network stream when it's working, install the release candidate and do another dump of the network stream with it not working. Sift through to find the changes.

When the person posted that there was a problem with the RC, It was probably a web socket being mishandled by the proxy due to some change. You can't just go oh there's a problem with my third party middleware. They're going to need to know which of their changes broke the problem. Why it breaks it, and what should be done instead if you expect them to make any kind of changes.

The alternative is you ask them to support traffic or HA or NPM, and on a volunteer project I could see that being a bridge too far