this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
846 points (98.7% liked)
Public Freakout
2717 readers
319 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It doesn't. That's why. Being the descendent of those who had power to kill anyone who disagreed with their claim of "divine right" and getting a special title for it is directly opposed to democracy.
I'm the sense of a modern democracy, you are talking about a dictator.
King Charles doesn't have this power in a constitutional monarchy.
He does have the power to dissolve parliament, immense wealth, as well as physical and financial security not enjoyed by the general population. And this is granted not by merit nor democracy but, because his ancestors had the resources to kill anyone who thought that they weren't granted the right to rule over everyone by their god. And his uncle was even a big fan of Hitler, which was covered up for decades.
Monarchies of any sort are fundamentally unjust power structures that are relics of a bygone era with no business existing in modern times.